Quoting a month old post: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/prSnGGAgfWtZexYLp/is-90-of-c...
My current understanding (based on this text and other sources) is:
- There exist some teams at Anthropic where around 90% of lines of code that get merged are written by AI, but this is a minority of teams.
- The average over all of Anthropic for lines of merged code written by AI is much less than 90%, more like 50%.
They're Google, they out-scale everyone. They run more than 1.3 quadrillion tokens per month through LLMs!
If true, could this explain why Anthropics APIs are less reliable than Gemini's? (I've never gotten a service overloaded response from Google like I did from Anthropic)