Some good ones: - United States v. One Solid Gold Object in Form of a Rooster - United States v. 11 1/4 Dozen Packages of Articles Labeled in Part Mrs. Moffat's Shoo-Fly Powders for Drunkenness - South Dakota v. Fifteen Impounded Cats
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Article_Consi...
Always wanted the cat, or the Honda Civic or whatever to ask to represent themselves. I guess if there was a foreclosure against an Nvidia Spark with a local LLM it might be able to give it a worthy try.
The Rooster won.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_national_legal_systems...
It might not be possible to do something like that in France (though I assume there are other mechanisms available in that case).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Court_of_Appeals... -> Louisiana isn't in the list for the court that handled that trial.
The images of the various messages on the adguard page are not lawsuits.
They are threatening messages that threaten to create legal issues, but until and unless they carry through on the threats, are simply "threats" to the extent we've been given any visibility into the messages contents.
In rem = the thing is the defendant. You're not suing a person, and you're asking the court to decide who owns or controls a specific property.
The quintessential case is United States v. $124,700
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._$124,700_in_U...
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2025/02/isp-sued-by-reco...
This law is completely backwards, and worse than a SLAPP. If you cannot respond to a report in any way, it should be null.