cheevly parent
95% of HN comments nowadays amount to: "I have no idea how to wield AI, but I'm going to talk authoritatively on the subject and use fallacies to downplay the claims of others."
More like “i tried what others claim extensively and it does not work for me, please let me know if im doing something wrong” — to which the response is often yours, reframing the observation as a fallacy.
Can you point me to some of those comments?
I genuinely haven't seen them.
I see many people insisting it didn't work when they tried it for some little thing, therefore it's broken and useless. And a few people saying, actually it works really well if you're willing to learn how to use it.
I'm not sure I've ever seen someone here saying it hasn't worked but they're open to learning how to use it right. It's definitely not common.