I presented that statement in my first comment. It is still there, unedited. I also pointed to it several times.
There was a choice to focus on the opinion-based stuff or the technical stuff. Other users pointed out that this thread was about learning how it works (they got it right), but you also ignored them.
> sanitizers (AddressSanitizer, MemorySanitizer, etc.) are dynamic analysis—runtime instrumentation, not static analysis.
Fair enough. They are traditional non-AI tools though. It's like you're trying to catch me on a technicality (I mislabelled something, but it doesn't actually interfere much in the point I was trying to get across).
---
Of course things escalated, and I was harsh on purpose. When someone starts with too much "I am this and that, I worked on this and that", you close doors, not open them.
> pretending you've been stonewalled
I don't think I was stonewalled or anything. As I previously mentioned, this is on a subthread of a comment that got flagged. Absolutely no one is reading this, it's an irrelevant conversation. If anything, I am extending a courtesy here of answering the guy who got his comment removed.
> If you want to talk about the technical question, I'm here.
I presented that statement in my first comment. It is still there, unedited. I also pointed to it several times.
There was a choice to focus on the opinion-based stuff or the technical stuff. Other users pointed out that this thread was about learning how it works (they got it right), but you also ignored them.
> sanitizers (AddressSanitizer, MemorySanitizer, etc.) are dynamic analysis—runtime instrumentation, not static analysis.
Fair enough. They are traditional non-AI tools though. It's like you're trying to catch me on a technicality (I mislabelled something, but it doesn't actually interfere much in the point I was trying to get across).
---
Of course things escalated, and I was harsh on purpose. When someone starts with too much "I am this and that, I worked on this and that", you close doors, not open them.
> pretending you've been stonewalled
I don't think I was stonewalled or anything. As I previously mentioned, this is on a subthread of a comment that got flagged. Absolutely no one is reading this, it's an irrelevant conversation. If anything, I am extending a courtesy here of answering the guy who got his comment removed.
> If you want to talk about the technical question, I'm here.
I have zero need to talk about this.