jama211 parent
I am fine with it using AI but it makes me feel pretty icky that they didn’t mention that this was ai/llm generated at any point in this article. That’s a no-no IMO, and has turned me off this pretty strongly.
Why do you care what technology was used to generate the summaries? What if they had used their old NLP summarizer?
They don't explicitly say they generate summaries at any point in the article. In fact I read it and though this was just some fancy RSS aggregator. The way they describe the "daily briefing" is extremely ambiguous.
OK, but I'd like to repeat my question here: Why do you care how the summary was generated?
I'm not the person you asked, but it's useful to know if the summary was generated using a method prone to inaccuracy.
Many reasons, if this news were summarised by humans I would prefer it, one example reason is with AI summaries I know to look out for hallucinations.
To be honest though that’s not the point. I’m more annoyed they weren’t transparent about their methods than I am about them using AI.