Preferences

In a way, yes, you'd be paying the people not just to write down the rules but to discover them first. And there's the accuracy/correctness/interpretability tradeoff.

But also, have there been any attempts on the scale of the Manhattan project attempting to create a GOFAI?

Because one idea I ran into is that we might be able to use genAI to create a GOFAI soon. And it would be as hard as using genAI for any kind of large project. But I also can't convincingly claim that it's somehow provably impossible.


dwaltrip
You can’t “write down the rules” for intelligence. Not for any reasonable definition of “writing”. The medium of writing is not rich enough to express what is needed.

This is why GOFAI failed.

martin-t OP
Do you believe intelligence can be achieved using ANNs? If so, ANNs can be serialized, therefore writing is rich enough.

It might not be an easy to work with format though. If you believe the broad LLM architecture is capable of reaching true intelligence, then writing is still enough because all LLMs are is the written training data and the written training algorithm. It's just that is was impossible to pay people to write enough training data and provide enough compute to process it before.

This item has no comments currently.