Hacker Neue

Preferences
theandrewbailey parent
Maybe SSH/3 instead (SSH + HTTP/3)?
throwaway127482
Doesn't /3 mean v3? I mean, for HTTP itself, doesn't the HTTP/3 == HTTPv3? If so, I don't see how this is any better than SSH3 - both SSH3 and SSH/3 read to me like "SSH v3"
theandrewbailey OP
Yes, but HTTP is about the only thing that versions with a slash. By writing it SSH/3, it would emphasize its relationship with HTTP/3, instead of it being the third version of SSH.
Dylan16807
> Doesn't /3 mean v3?

I've seen very little do that. Probably just HTTP, and it's using a slash specifically to emphasize a big change.

techscruggs
I like this idea!

Having SSH in the name helps developers quickly understand the problem domain it improves upon.

bingabingabinga (dead)

This item has no comments currently.