For future reference, the flagged parent comment was: "Slop."
is this becoming the latest way to attack an idea? instead of engaging with the actual content you just claim it is AI and therefore it can be ignored? seems disingenuous to say the least.
It's pointing out that the person who posted something couldn't be bothered to actually write it themselves. The "content" is the prompt, which is of course never shared because it's probably so trite that it's not going to get anyone's interest unless it's stochastically decompressed into a large amount of text.
Like the sibling commenter, I do not write Ruby and do not care about this conflict apart from a general interest in supply chain stuff. I'm merely tired of the constant encroachment of obvious LLM prose in HN submissions and (albeit less commonly) in comments.