My understanding is the piece argued state support as investor and customer might turn intel around.
Huawei started with much worse product and foundation than intel, but the state sponsorship kept it going, plus they have ultra hard working people and occasionally some shameless thieves, which made them where they are.
Huawei started with much worse product and foundation than intel, but the state sponsorship kept it going, plus they have ultra hard working people and occasionally some shameless thieves, which made them where they are.