Preferences

matthewdgreen parent
The losers are going to be the energy companies who think they’re getting long-term energy sales but probably won’t be, since these techniques will get more efficient.

idiotsecant
The techniques will get more efficient, but the quantity of training will increase monotonically. We aren't going to use less energy overall. The ratepayers are absolutely the ones who will lose out on this.
dorkypunk
nitwit005
People using consumer generative AIs are already using it for free, or very cheaply. It may be hard for falling costs to drive more demand.
ericmcer
The demand for energy will never go down, the more we can produce the more we will use.
lotsofpulp
The article says

> Electricity demand in the U.S. held steady for 15 years but, last year, it increased by 3%— marking the fifth-highest rise this century. More jumps are projected for years to come.

https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/electricity/electricity-...

Total electricity generated has been relatively flat for a couple decades.

0cf8612b2e1e
Surely EVs would change the equation. Also increasing installation of heat pumps vs gas heating.
lotsofpulp
Perhaps, my point was an electricity supplier that invested a ton of money in the early 2000s assuming that aggregate demand will keep growing forever would have been in for a rough time.

A variety of factors may or may not make a future where aggregate electricity demand would increases, or stagnates, or even declined.

This item has no comments currently.