Preferences

Allegedly, some companies with deep pockets have paid them for access to their collection. The collection turns out to be useful for training LLMs.

Can confirm this is happening. But the money paid is tiny. Think thousands of dollars, not millions. Not enough to keep the lights on. I would assume they do pretty well from donations.
Never assume anyone does well from donations. That's rarely the case.
Donors get benefits.
Source on this claim? All their torrents are released publicly. Why would "companies with deep pockets" need to pay them?
Because they have an interest in the ongoing work of archiving of new things I guess
For fast access
Paying someone, even a pittance, gives you deniability and a chain of ownership.

Using a torrent of the exact same thing does not.

This item has no comments currently.

Keyboard Shortcuts

Story Lists

j
Next story
k
Previous story
Shift+j
Last story
Shift+k
First story
o Enter
Go to story URL
c
Go to comments
u
Go to author

Navigation

Shift+t
Go to top stories
Shift+n
Go to new stories
Shift+b
Go to best stories
Shift+a
Go to Ask HN
Shift+s
Go to Show HN

Miscellaneous

?
Show this modal