I still don’t see this, if only for the Managerial instinct for ass-covering.
If something really matters and a prod showstopper emerges, can those non-technical supervisory managers be completely, absolutely, 100% sure the AI can fix the code and bring everything back up? If not, the buck would surely stop with them and they would be utterly helpless in that situation. The Board waiting on conference call while they stare at a pageful of code that may as well be written in ancient Sumerian.
I can see developers taking a higher level role and using these tools, but I can’t really see managers interfacing directly with AI code generation. Unless they are completely risk tolerant, and you don’t get far up the greasy pole with those tendencies.
If the development is between non-technical management and some AI tool they have been using, how do they insulate themselves from being accountable to their superiors? Who is responsible, and who gets to fix it?
If your company removes all developers and lets the managers vibe code instead, I’ll get the popcorn in for the next outage.
I’m looking for a way out of tech because of it.