Wouldn't you yearn for any more impact given how much that amount of resource could improve the lives of many, if used wisely?
Cynical take: increasing Meta's stock value does improve the lifes of many - the many stock holders.
Thus: when you talk about improving lifes, you better specify which group you are targeting, and why you selected this particular group.
The reason I'm interested in this is twofold
First, I think the current system is exploitative. I don't advocate for communism or anything, but the current system of extracting value from the lower class is disgusting
Second, they outnumber the successful people by a vast margin and I don't want them to have a reason to re-invent the guillotine
you can be successful and lower class.
But we are talking about an ad company here, trying to branch out into ai to sell more ads, right? Meta existing is without a doubt a net negative for mankind.
Though for me the risk of the shops failing and people being out of a job would still stress me heh
- Percy Bysshe Shelley
I'd forget the word shareholder even exists.