Preferences

tacker2000 parent
Actually i saw bloomberg doing this a couple of days ago, it was “subscribe for 1.99 a month” and you could use apple pay. [1]

I thought then that they could also use this to just sell the articles for 0.49 or something, since it significantly reduces friction.

But then again the proportional transaction fees for a small amount like this are probably too high.

[1] https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-06-23/tesla-rob...


shafyy
Yes many newspaper offer this super cheap first month options. However, at least I, would rather pay 1 € to read one article without a subscription I need to worry about later, than pay € 2 to subscribe for a month.
dyauspitr
It would have to be $0.05 an article. 50 cents is way too high.
dmurray
Not at Bloomberg's end of the market.

I'd happily click through some "see this article for $0.49" or even 1.99, but I won't subscribe to "1 month for 1.99" because I've been conditioned to expect that this will either start billing me 19.99 per month in perpetuity, or that it will take half an hour of my time to cancel, or both.

jbverschoor
One of the reasons why mobile games sell game credits.
carlosjobim
How is your reasoning? If an article isn't even worth 50 cents, then why is it worth your time to read it? We only have limited time in this world, death is approaching swiftly.
dyauspitr
The reasoning being that at that price you make your profits on volume. Not a lot of people are going to buy an article unless the price is pretty much throwaway.
carlosjobim
Can you give some examples of purchases for 5 cents that you have made?
dyauspitr
A physical copy of the daily newspaper is $2. There’s no way I’m paying $0.50 for one article in the entire newspaper. It should probably be less than $0.05 an article.

This item has no comments currently.