> This article is presuming that students are somehow blind to the idea that copying work from other places means they don’t actually learn.
Where is the article doing that? I.e. assuming that the students are sleep-walking into not learning?
It's obvious to the rhetorical everyone that students are using AI to cheat, and that they know that because of that they are not learning, and that they don't give a shit.
Where is the article doing that? I.e. assuming that the students are sleep-walking into not learning?
It's obvious to the rhetorical everyone that students are using AI to cheat, and that they know that because of that they are not learning, and that they don't give a shit.