> tools that are empirically required to have a seat at the international table since 1945 — because you ask politely.
Umm, what? There are plenty of countries that "have a seat at the table" without nuclear weapons. Depending on what you mean by "seat at the table", of course, but I'm not sure there's any way to define it that excludes 95% of countries.
f33d5173
Maybe if defined as "permanent member of the un security council".
sorcerer-mar
When push comes to shove, 100% of those states are either victims or vassals of a nuclear state.
Umm, what? There are plenty of countries that "have a seat at the table" without nuclear weapons. Depending on what you mean by "seat at the table", of course, but I'm not sure there's any way to define it that excludes 95% of countries.