Preferences

maxgrinev parent
Great questions! Let me break this down:

Target audience:

1) Enterprise IT teams who already know SQL/YAML - they can build complex integrations after ~1 hour of training using our examples, no prior Python needed

2) Modern data teams using dbt - Sequor complements it perfectly for data ingestion and activation

What they gain:

Full flexibility with structure. Enterprise IT folks go from zero to building end-to-end solutions in an hour without needing developer support. Think "dbt but for API integrations."

Competitors & differentiation:

1) Zapier/n8n: GUI looks easy but gets complex fast, poor database integration, can't handle bulk data

2) Fivetran/Airbyte: Pre-built connectors only, zero customization, ingestion-only

3) Us: Only code-first solution using open tech stack (SQL+YAML+Python) - gives you flexibility with Fivetran reliability

Business model:

1) Core engine: Open source, free forever

2) Revenue: On-premise server with enterprise features (RBAC, observability and execution monitoring with notifications, audit logs) - flat fee per installation, no per-row costs like competitors

3) Services: Custom connector development and app-to-app integration flows (we love this work!)

4) Cloud version maybe later - everyone wants on-premise now

The key difference:

we're the only tool that's both easy to learn AND highly customizable for all major API integration patterns: data ingestion, reverse ETL, and multi-step iPaaS workflows - all in one platform.


This item has no comments currently.