You are certainly free to write in any fashion you want, but any time you turn “raw” (as in raw photography, raw image data, raw image formats) into “RAW”, or Wasm into “WASM”, etc., you will[0] be knowingly wrong—like non-dyslexic people who choose to spell “u” instead of “you”, except unlike them you will not be saving keystrokes and you will be perceived as shouting, which I presume is almost never the intended vibe in the context.
Obviously, it’s not the end of the world. Employees of famous companies, occasionally even reputable and knowledgeable people are not immune to using wrong or mistaken spelling. This is explained by a simple fact that there are plenty of professionals who are dyslexic and/or careless about spelling, while still being experts in their subject areas. There is nothing wrong about that, but evidence of their misuse of written language is not grounds for an argument that the wrong spelling is correct. Researching what the word actually stands for takes less than a minute, and it should clear any doubt and avoid unnecessary arguments.
Obviously, it’s not the end of the world. Employees of famous companies, occasionally even reputable and knowledgeable people are not immune to using wrong or mistaken spelling. This is explained by a simple fact that there are plenty of professionals who are dyslexic and/or careless about spelling, while still being experts in their subject areas. There is nothing wrong about that, but evidence of their misuse of written language is not grounds for an argument that the wrong spelling is correct. Researching what the word actually stands for takes less than a minute, and it should clear any doubt and avoid unnecessary arguments.
[0] Now that you know…