Once those groups you mention are consulted, who actually chooses which parcels to sell? Is it someone or a group in the Executive Branch? Do you think "consulted" means more than "we're considering selling these specific lands... What do you think?" Once that consultation is done are there any restrictions, based on the feedback, about which lands can be sold? Or is it enough to have asked for comment and then it's ok to ignore those comments?

RE FMV, in particular for large parcels of land, valuation is a very subjective exercise. It's not only the land itself that determines that, but the credibility of the buyer. You might get an offer that's x, but then that buyer is considered unable to perform, but this other buyer at .5x has the means to close and therefore that's the FMV? Who decides whether a buyer is able to perform? That's a simple example, but there are countless ways to massage the definition of FMV. That applies to the sale of an every day home, but for large tracts of land it's impossible to argue FMV unless there's language in the law that says "at least x appraisals, with the appraisers drawn from lottery, for each parcel, must be performed and than averaged to get the asking price. And then qualified buyers are drawn from a hat once their ability to close is vetted." Are any of these checks in place in the bill?

You've read the bill. I'm begging the question(s) here, but I'm open to be surprised to find adequate checks that make the skepticism of so many comments in this thread unwarranted. If you tell me to read the bill myself I get it, but I'm interested in the dialogue if you're willing to share what you've learned about the details.

edit: autocorrect