I live in the West and have spent a lot of time on BLM land and in rural parts of Utah. The housing argument seems specious to me. BLM land is often on the extreme end of rural. A lot of it is uninhabitable - no utilities, no buildable acreage, no jobs nearby, very limited accessibility.
I don’t see it as a good faith argument, but open to be corrected.
tstrimple
One less place to crash for free in a tent as well.
"The law, in its majestic equality, forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal their bread."
I don’t see it as a good faith argument, but open to be corrected.