It only enforces a restrictive covenant for 10 years. Buy land in 2026, build a few homes, repurpose to a datacenter campus in 2036. Looks like that would be entirely legal from reading the bill.

If they were concerned about future redevelopment they should have put a 50-100 year restrictive covenant in the bill, not only 10 years.

the "law", OK well here's "law", TikTok was supposed to be banned from the US about six months ago and SCOTUS even upheld it. Arrests are supposed to be made with agents that identify themselves and even if it's a nice day out read those crusty old "miranda rights" - we now watch videos all day long of masked, unidentified men jumping out of cars with no license plates and disappearing US citizens. Or tackling US Senators to the ground and detaining them for verbally interrupting a federal employee who reports to the Senate for oversight. You know, normal stuff.

None of these "laws" seem to matter at all so it will be quite trivial to make a datacenter get written off as a nature center or whatever this "law" permits