An excerpt from the abstract is below, listing some issues they have with the mainstream heliocentric model, which are presumably resolved elegantly by the Tychos model:
Anomalies of the Keplerian/heliocentric model include:
1: whether the Sun has a binary companion,
2: why only Mercury and Venus have no moons,
3: why Venus always presents the same face to Earth at its closest approach,
4: the “anomalous” precession of Mercury’s perihelion, and other aspects of Mercury and Venus,
5: the cause of the General Precession (Newton’s lunisolar wobble theory is not it, it does not match with observables),
6: why Mars and Sun exhibit 79-year cycles locked at a 2:1 ratio (and many other “harmonies” found between bodies),
7: why there is a sidereal diurnal variation of G, in interferometry results, and in the movements of stars,
8: why sunspot formation location shows a geocentric preference, and more.
jiggawatts
A small error in a simplified (non-relativistic!) model does not in any way imply the truth of its diametric opposite.
PS: I find it entertaining that I can judge the crackpot level from the URL itself without even having to click it.
Here's a 1-page abstract from the 2025 Demysticon conference: https://files.catbox.moe/j8rd0s.pdf
An excerpt from the abstract is below, listing some issues they have with the mainstream heliocentric model, which are presumably resolved elegantly by the Tychos model: