Is this true? My understanding is that the 1A has been understood by SCOTUS as a restriction on government power to influence speech, _not_ as a right granted to individuals.
This item has no comments currently.
It looks like you have JavaScript disabled. This web app requires that JavaScript is enabled.
Please enable JavaScript to use this site (or just go read Hacker News).
Is this true? My understanding is that the 1A has been understood by SCOTUS as a restriction on government power to influence speech, _not_ as a right granted to individuals.