Preferences

> Poltical stories that show "evidence of some interesting new phenomenon" are not against the guidelines.

Call me evil and obtuse, but this is neither interesting, nor new. The only thing new here is that (it seems) a huge swath of people are learning how the law works for the first time.

Brad Lander had nothing to do with the situation. He's a politician, and he was there "observing". It's the equivalent if I walked down to the Manhattan courthouse, ran up to the first defendant in shackles I saw in the hallway, and started interfering with their movement. I'd be arrested.

The fact that you, as a random bystander, aren't shown ID and briefed on the situation isn't relevant. If you aren't involved, you aren't involved.


Tadpole9181
The ununiformed, masked men that refuse to identify themselves and won't show any legal documents have unilateral authority and cannot be questioned. Do not resist.

You will not receive a trial. You will be sent to a black site. Your family or lawyer will not be informed.

America: home of the free.

timr OP
> The ununiformed, masked men that refuse to identify themselves and won't show any legal documents have unilateral authority and cannot be questioned. Do not resist.

Again, Brad Lander was not being detained. He had nothing to do with anything. That's not "resistance", it's just interference.

Tadpole9181
Brad Lander saw unidentified, masked, ununiformed men who refused to speak, had no legal documentation, and would not identify themselves to anyone carrying a man against his will.

I hope it's not against the rules to swear, but this cannot be stated clearly enough: That's called a fucking kidnapping.

Did you not hear that someone pretending to be LEO attempted (and succeed in one case) the political assassination of two legislators and their spouses this weekend? More than ever, every single LEO should be under scrutiny for identification! He has every right to prevent a man from being disappeared by God knows who!

You may be a boot-stepping authoritarian who fully condones a US gestapo who can disappear anyone without question. The rest of us have higher standards and common sense.

timr OP
> Brad Lantern saw unidentified, masked, ununiformed men who refused to speak, had no legal documentation, and would not identify themselves to anyone carrying a man against his will.

Brad Lander was at the man's trial for illegal immigration, which was in a federal court building. So, you know...context matters. Also you can clearly see uniforms in the video [1], but I digress.

There is exactly zero chance that Lander was under the illusion that this hypothetical, rogue, pirate kidnapping operation smuggled themselves into a federal immigration court, Boondock Saints-style, in order to abduct the one guy Lander happened to be watching in the immigration trial just moments before.

[1] https://www.amny.com/news/brad-lander-arrested-ice-court-hea...

RandomBacon
> I hope it's not against the rules to swear

Perhaps then, you should go ahead and read the rules?

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Tadpole9181
Sorry, I was being rhetorical for emphasis. And as a slight acknowledgement of HN's more recent flag-happy state.
RandomBacon
No problem. I also acknowledge that some people find the expectation that they should read rules offensive and worthy of downvotes as my previous comment was downvoted by someone else (and I'm okay with this comment also being downvoted because talking ("complaining") about such is against the rules lol).

This item has no comments currently.