Preferences

strangescript parent
Everyone is still thinking about this problem the wrong way. If you are still running one agent, on one project at a time, yes, its not going to be all that helpful if you are already a fast, solid coder.

Run three, run five. Prompt with voice annotation. Run them when normally you need a cognitive break. Run them while you watch netflix on another screen. Have them do TDD. Use an orchestrator. So many more options.

I feel like another problem is deep down most developers hate debugging other people's code and thats effectively what this is at times. It doesn't matter if your Associate ran off and saved you 50k lines of typing, you would still rather do it yourself than debug the code.

I would give you grave warnings, telling you the time is nigh, adapt or die, etc, but it doesn't matter. Eventually these agents will be good enough that the results will surpass you even in simple one task at a time mode.


kibibu
I have never seen people work harder to dismantle their own industry than software engineers are right now.
strangescript OP
What exactly is the alternative? Wish it away? Developers have been automating away jobs for decades, its seems hypocritical to complain about it now.
hooverd
who gets the spoils?
marssaxman
We've been automating ourselves out of our jobs as long as we've had them; somehow, despite it all, we never run out of work to do.
kibibu
We've automated bullshit tedium work, like building and deploying, but this is the first time in my memory that people are actively trying to automate all the fun parts away.

Closest parallel I can think of is the code-generation-from-UML era, but that explicitly kept the design decisions on the human side, and never really took over the world.

hooverd
Sounds like a way to blast your focus into a thousand pieces
sponnath
Can you actually demonstrate this workflow producing good software?

This item has no comments currently.