I think the intro makes clear that all languages went through the same tests.
Edit: though I agree with another top-level comment that the reported results are too vague and stereotypical to be believed.
> I think the intro makes clear that all languages went through the same tests.
I know, but then it goes on to show widely different, half baked examples with poor explanations.
After reading other top level comments I agree with the others that this is probably AI slop. The only thing I achieved ny reading it was wasting a few minutes.
Go seems to have been tested with http handling, Rust with sequential computation heavy jobs, C++ with parallel processing and so on.
Maybe this is just one example from each language but this is just confusing.