Preferences

JonChesterfield parent
Had two. One showed so much measurement noise they couldn't trust it, other kept cutting out. Not great.

lionkor
So three ones, two different models, one in a different location. These are like... basics, no?
ricardobeat
If you multiply every critical component by 3x there will be no room left for anything else.
pclmulqdq
2n + 1 is a basic minimum amount of redundancy for anything critical in a high-value space mission.
adastra22
This isn't a high-value space mission.
pclmulqdq
The price of a ride to the moon alone would make this "high-value." Cubesats are an example of when you can get away with no redundancy, but this is not a cubesat.
lionkor
Well the way they did it (twice) means they had space for other stuff, and of course also failed because they didn't have enough redudancy
slippery slope fallacy. just do engineering good

This item has no comments currently.