And yes, I have Windows 11 installed
I can't tell you why it seems to think that it is a valid TPM 2.0 module, but a lot of people have reported seeing similar things, e.g. https://old.reddit.com/r/techsupport/comments/rrta2r/tpm_que...
(Btw. I'm pretty sure 16 is larger than 2. It's not saying 1.1.6. It's a version string, not a decimal number)
Edit: The name of the specification is: Trusted Platform Module Library Family “2.0”, Revision 1.16. This was released in 2014: https://trustedcomputinggroup.org/resource/tpm-library-speci...
So yes, this is TPM 2.0. And TPM 2.0 was released in a non-draft version at the time my CPU was made. And the "1.16" is the revision number of the TPM 2.0 specification that it supports.
This item has no comments currently.
It looks like you have JavaScript disabled. This web app requires that JavaScript is enabled.
Please enable JavaScript to use this site (or just go read Hacker News).
And yes, I have Windows 11 installed
I can't tell you why it seems to think that it is a valid TPM 2.0 module, but a lot of people have reported seeing similar things, e.g. https://old.reddit.com/r/techsupport/comments/rrta2r/tpm_que...
(Btw. I'm pretty sure 16 is larger than 2. It's not saying 1.1.6. It's a version string, not a decimal number)
Edit: The name of the specification is: Trusted Platform Module Library Family “2.0”, Revision 1.16. This was released in 2014: https://trustedcomputinggroup.org/resource/tpm-library-speci...
So yes, this is TPM 2.0. And TPM 2.0 was released in a non-draft version at the time my CPU was made. And the "1.16" is the revision number of the TPM 2.0 specification that it supports.