George was only "radical" because he sought out the root of the existence of involuntary poverty in the midst of riches, and then described a simple way of eradicating it.
Economists employed by universities founded by monopolists understood that their route to security - tenure - did not have room for even mentioning George's ideas to their students. (Witness what the Wharton School at Penn did to Scott Nearing, whose ideas up to that point (1915) were largely Georgist.)
As Thoreau said, "There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil
to one who is striking at the root." The evil he was referring to is poverty.
George was pointing out the root, and provided the tool for removing it. It's too bad that it hasn't yet been implemented.
Economists employed by universities founded by monopolists understood that their route to security - tenure - did not have room for even mentioning George's ideas to their students. (Witness what the Wharton School at Penn did to Scott Nearing, whose ideas up to that point (1915) were largely Georgist.)
As Thoreau said, "There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one who is striking at the root." The evil he was referring to is poverty.
George was pointing out the root, and provided the tool for removing it. It's too bad that it hasn't yet been implemented.