To the point they are wanting to eliminate AM radio because they've gotten to the point that the uncontrollable EMI makes AM "unlistenable". So move the goal posts, and make AM radio out-of-fashion and get rid of it rather than solving the EMI issues.
2) WiFi really isn't as reliable as a cable. There are all kinds of things internal and external that could cause an outage. Why bother with that when you can just run maybe a dollar of copper to the ECU?
Then you have physical interference...imagine all your warning lights come on, wipers come on, and radio cuts off because your wife put her Stanley in just the wrong spot.
It's a technique for controlling (or reading) large numbers of LEDs, switches, etc, with surprisingly little wiring. Instead of the usual X/Y of multiplexed I/O, the wiring is diagonal. To control 12 outputs (36 in groups of 3) you'd need just 4 pins (if your lamps are not LEDs, though, you probably need to put some diodes in there)
Surely without cables it's far easier, but this easiness have a price.
[1] with the exception of the car charger since I wasn't able to find a damn cabled one (it's 230Vac, not CCS eh!)
I appreciate the geek, but is this useful in practice? Does it happen to anyone?
Aside another aspect is how to make the home impossible to live in case someone illegally occupy it (here, France, but essentially all south Europe is a relatively new but spread thing) while you are on vacation to be quicker than local authorities. Another one is avoiding connecting too much black boxes to their OEM homes.
Another final aspect is mere reliability, as a small anecdote: a neighbor due to some unknown issue have had roller shutters locked down because they have ONLY a wireless remote with a kind of ESP32 inside, all proprietary, no emergency manual opening, no access to the motor to power it directly or detach the break manually on the shutters. My home while "a bit smart" have a far little attack surface in that regard. For instance just to have central/remote lights control I've chosen a set of ShellyPro 4PM (the least expensive option of that kind I was able to find) witch operate remotely (LAN only, via HA or directly logging on the device, extended via wireguard) but i can also operate via classic mechanical switches and internally the Shelly are "dumb classic switch" + extras so if their fw crash from the physical buttons (not the one on the devices, but their normally open contacts) they still operate. For the car charger I'm obliged to go wifi (I find exactly no one domestic charging station with wired connections for control) but it's a dedicated WLAN (a small GL.iNet "stamp" size on the back of the charger, wired to a dedicated port of my homeserver on a completely separated LAN without internet access and the charger itself is MQTT/ModBUS-bridged to its local, internet-less controller/server for p.v. integration.
I can't do nothing for my car and well... Sometimes it's "app-service" to remote control A/C etc get connected to someone else car in another country and yes, I can monitor it and act on it when this happen (few times per years so far). No special hacking needed. No response from the vendor (MG/SAIC)... And for cars some demoed serious remote vulnerabilities able to physically make a car crash while running.
All those might be very rare events, but their seriousness it's relevant enough for me to avoid them as much as possible.
It started with places where you simply can't have wires, for example tire pressure monitoring. But is now spreading to other simple ECUs. And yes, it can be jammed so obviously it's not for brakes and steering and things like that.
Seriously why the heck not?
I've thought in the past what I want for trailer lights is a RF connection between the vehicle and the trailer. It can't be worse than the standard way that always fails.