Preferences

PaulDavisThe1st parent
I think you may have been reading too many IETF documents.

Legal text doesn't come with a list of definitions that attempt to lock e.g. "shall" down in stone.


torstenvl
I rarely read IETF documents. But as a practicing lawyer for about 15 years, I've read, interpreted, drafted, advised on, and litigated countless uses of the word "shall" in agreements (as well as in statutes and regulations). In fact my first pro bono case in BigLaw, on behalf of a nonprofit in a corporate election case, hinged on it. Shall is not this mysterious ambiguous beast the link makes it out to be.
PaulDavisThe1st OP
I will absolutely defer to your judgement then.

Which leaves the problem of intent ... is what I termed "way #2" above what was intended? Or is this just sloppy use of language with unintended side effects?

This item has no comments currently.