Preferences

the__alchemist parent
The three-body problem, as a concept, feels like a twist on the hammer-and-nail analogy: If analytic methods are the hammer, anything that doesn't resemble a nail is an anomaly (Framed as in this article, notoriously hard). Amusingly, this applies to most practical calculations (perhaps all when examined closely enough).

zoogeny
It reminds me of a YouTube course on general relativity where the instructor went from most basic elements and built up towards a complete description of the full math. I was able to follow along step-by-step at the time but there were a lot of quite complicated steps which I would have no ability to reproduce myself.

I recall a few of the steps made assumptions on our ability to calculate. I think, for example, they narrowed down the set of all vector spaces to just those spaces that were differentiable. I may be mis-remembering the precise detail but it was something along those lines, and this was just one of a few instances of this kind of "throw away cases that we are unable to calculate" along the path. In some cases the narrowing was justified but in a few the instructor admitted that the entire reason we were excluding possible sets of solutions was because they would otherwise make the next steps impossible.

selimthegrim
Do you have a link to the playlist?
zoogeny
I am pretty sure (but not certain) it was this one: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6YPgEhGKjOGKriFcF0LC...
zeroonetwothree
We consider “cos 123” an exact solution even though to numerically calculate it requires a power series approximation. So 3 body problem is just as “exact” as that.
cynicalkane
This isn't why. You can always use a convenient Taylor series to approximate cosine anything to arbitrary precision. For the three-body problem, small changes to initial conditions diverge into incalculably chaotic behavior.
rewmie
> We consider “cos 123” an exact solution even though to numerically calculate it requires a power series approximation.

I think you're confusing what an exact solution is supposed to be with your own approximation of the exact solution. In your own example, cos(123) would represent a closed form solution to the problem. That solution doesn't cease to be exact if you decide to express it as a finite power series.

But couldn't one say the same about P vs NP? No polynomial algorithm for SAT being analogous to no analytic solution for 3-body?

It's not that closed form answers are required by the insistence of anyone, I just thought it's just of purely mathematical interest of what kinds of problems there are, like problems placed in P vs in NP.

This item has no comments currently.