Preferences

To be fired in the latest layoff a few weeks later.... Not sure what you want them to do?

Often established businesses that find themselves in a precarious financial situation will announce a hiring freeze several months before resorting to layoffs.

It's a much easier decision than laying people off, and much easier to reverse, so it can be taken a lot earlier. And you'll get a modest but relatively painless reduction in headcount due to attrition, if the rest of the job market is buoyant. It also means, if layoffs are needed a few months down the line, there isn't anyone being laid off on the day they join the company.

Of course, there are some situations where this doesn't work so well - for example, if employees will interpret the hiring freeze as a sign layoffs are inevitable they might suffer months of sleepless nights worrying if their neck will be on the chopping block.

AFAIK there was a hiring freeze mandate from the board and the previous CEO ignored this. Hence was fired...

The new CEO had to rectify the situation. Its a horrible situation but at the end of the day, it was going to happen

Don’t make employment offers and then rescind them? Seems pretty obvious

This item has no comments currently.

Keyboard Shortcuts

Story Lists

j
Next story
k
Previous story
Shift+j
Last story
Shift+k
First story
o Enter
Go to story URL
c
Go to comments
u
Go to author

Navigation

Shift+t
Go to top stories
Shift+n
Go to new stories
Shift+b
Go to best stories
Shift+a
Go to Ask HN
Shift+s
Go to Show HN

Miscellaneous

?
Show this modal