Preferences

westurner parent
Is there a transform between Minkowski 4-space rotations and 2D Holographic transformation(s)?

Mustn't they be reversible and locally unitary

(Edit)

PROMPT/QUERY: Generate SymPy with pytest.mark.parametrize tests to _ teach the transform between Minkowski 4-space rotations and 2D Holographic transformation(s)

- https://g.co/bard/share/f69e27dd9acd

- https://chat.openai.com/share/7bbda216-f232-4080-99ab-814bf6...

-

Do these converge upon a solution when you hit jumble?

(Edit)

From "Minkowski space" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minkowski_space :

> In 3-dimensional Euclidean space, the isometry group (the maps preserving the regular Euclidean distance) is the Euclidean group. It is generated by rotations, reflections and translations. When time is appended as a fourth dimension, the further transformations of translations in time and Lorentz boosts are added, and the group of all these transformations is called the Poincaré group. Minkowski's model follows special relativity where motion causes time dilation changing the scale applied to the frame in motion and shifts the phase of light.

> Spacetime is equipped with an indefinite non-degenerate bilinear form, variously called the Minkowski metric,[2] the Minkowski norm squared or Minkowski inner product depending on the context.[nb 2] The Minkowski inner product is defined so as to yield the spacetime interval between two events when given their coordinate difference vector as argument.[3] Equipped with this inner product, the mathematical model of spacetime is called Minkowski space. The group of transformations for Minkowski space that preserve the spacetime interval (as opposed to the spatial Euclidean distance) is the Poincaré group (as opposed to the isometry group).

But then how does Minkowski space help understand signals in spacetime with nonlocality and superfluid phases in deep space?

(Edit)

Q: Can a thing causally affect things outside of its light cone?

A: Yes because Nonlocal entanglement

Q: is Minkowski space wrong or inappropriate then? And, Are causal counterfactuals the same as constructor theory counterfactuals?


This item has no comments currently.