It’s not a cowboy who brings your steak to the table, but probably some undocumented immigrant paid slave wages and living in a shed.
https://amp.theguardian.com/world/2014/dec/21/life-inside-am...
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/05/08/exploitation-a...
https://www.jsonline.com/in-depth/news/special-reports/dairy...
https://www.onegreenplanet.org/environment/smithfields-hog-f...
https://stonepierpress.org/goodfoodnews/wastelands-book-revi...
I think that is an attitude that our culture will be ashamed of in the near future, just like we are ashamed of slavery now. The agricultural practices are almost identical (different mammal). The major difference is that we consume the flesh of one, and the produce of another.
The only reason for saying that the enslavement of other animals is ok, while the enslavement of humans is not, is if we can come up with a reason that makes us special and those other animals not. There is only shaky ground for any of those possible reasons, and believing them puts blinders on what we can know. I.e., we will not recognize things that do not fit our conceptions, which has big implications for our biological science, psychology and philosophy.
The fact is that meat eating, like slavery, is not reasonable. It is just something we grew up doing (individually and as a species). Any argument advocating it is as superficial and misleading as antebellum racial theorists. That is an uncomfortable truth.
For the record I eat meat, but I'm under no illusions regarding the cruelty of the process. I support all laws that would increase farm animal welfare, even if it means my steak gets more expensive, it's simple enough to make good veggie dishes once in a while.
We only stopped feeding cows to other cows because of a fear humans might get prion diseases.
Coming at it from the other direction, "what if humans were food?" is a horror trope, be it vampires, zombies, werewolves, or psychopath cannibals.