Hacker Neue

Preferences
rippercushions parent
They were paid, Stripe has just frozen the funds and apparently intends to refund the lot.
jacquesm
No, Stripe was paid. Really, the basics here are pretty simple: until your IPSP has released the funds to you you have not been paid. The fact that Stripe intends to refund is a pretty strong bit of evidence that the company has not been paid yet.

One thing that people that use services like Stripe really ought to do is to make sure they understand exactly what the position is that they maneuver themselves into, it looks like a lot of this is driven by wishful thinking rather than understanding.

Legally speaking Stripe has the option to refund a customer during the hold-back period at their discretion. Technically you are not supposed to send any physical goods until you have received the payment. If you do so that is at your own risk.

omeid2
If Stripe, or any payment processor was "paid" you would have to invoice them for tax purposes not the end user; and they will have to invoice and the end user and deal with Value Added and other taxes.
jacquesm
You should google the term 'merchant of record'. In this case Stripe is the merchant of record. If you bring your own merchant account then you are the merchant of record. In the first case it is Stripe that gets paid, in the second case it is you that gets paid. Either way, in this case the transactions will be reversed so it looks like soon nobody will have been paid. Stripe reduces your liability by acting as the merchant of record but the fact that that liability shifts to them gives them certain rights - and obligations - with respect to the funds, and a unilateral refund is part of those rights.

The moral of the story: do not enter into an agreement without understanding the terms and the practical implications of those terms when applied to you and the relationship with your customer as well as the transactions themselves if you don't want to be surprised by some of the potential outcomes.

omeid2
And Stripe isn't a Merchant of Record. They even have a specific product to overcome this, Stripe Tax.
jacquesm
According to all of the information the OP has given they are in this case. If you have evidence to the contrary I'm all open to it but it does not apply here unless you have information that contradicts the OP in a believable way.

Also: note that Stripe has all kinds of technical countermeasures in place to detect money laundering and other terms violations and it may well be that everything looks totally above board to an outsider whereas they have valid reasons to deny a party service.

2 More Comments →

This item has no comments currently.