> Currently, plans that are similar but with different billing intervals can best be expressed as two plans like: `plan:pro:annual@0` and `plan:pro:monthly@0`. We're very open to feedback on this approach though.
I think this makes sense because switching between them can be done very easily, just change the string from `plan:pro:annual@0` to `plan:pro:monthly@0`. As long as I can write some client side code that allows me to change if the end user is getting access to `plan:pro:annual@0` or `plan:pro:monthly@0` based on what they select on a UI.
> It seems possible. How do you envision the Auth0 action behaving with Tier?
Sorry, I'm not familiar with Auth0 actions. It was just an open-ended question because I saw someone proposed this on your Slack group.
I think this makes sense because switching between them can be done very easily, just change the string from `plan:pro:annual@0` to `plan:pro:monthly@0`. As long as I can write some client side code that allows me to change if the end user is getting access to `plan:pro:annual@0` or `plan:pro:monthly@0` based on what they select on a UI.
> It seems possible. How do you envision the Auth0 action behaving with Tier?
Sorry, I'm not familiar with Auth0 actions. It was just an open-ended question because I saw someone proposed this on your Slack group.