Preferences


Thanks! Macroexpanded:

The TTY Demystified (2008) - https://www.hackerneue.com/item?id=26803109 - April 2021 (35 comments)

The TTY demystified (2008) - https://www.hackerneue.com/item?id=17765683 - Aug 2018 (12 comments)

The TTY demystified (2008) - https://www.hackerneue.com/item?id=13571055 - Feb 2017 (43 comments)

The TTY demystified - https://www.hackerneue.com/item?id=10631513 - Nov 2015 (40 comments)

The TTY demystified (2008) - https://www.hackerneue.com/item?id=10064657 - Aug 2015 (31 comments)

The TTY demystified - https://www.hackerneue.com/item?id=8094186 - July 2014 (21 comments)

The TTY Demystified - https://www.hackerneue.com/item?id=4544318 - Sept 2012 (46 comments)

The TTY demystified - https://www.hackerneue.com/item?id=4062981 - June 2012 (17 comments)

The TTY demystified - https://www.hackerneue.com/item?id=658155 - June 2009 (13 comments)

mwcremer
Probably lots of other people have suggested this, but in case not: have you considered a “meta-page” that coalesces multiple submissions into one?
When the various discussions were years apart, like here, I suspect it would elide too much context to coalesce them.

But for submissions of the same vintage, it might be a good idea, and in fact not so different than the thread merging we already (but unsystematically) do.

almog OP
Cool, thank you!
Kinda neat, thanks.
metadat
Minor sidenote / hopefully welcome feedback:

When pasting HN link lists like this, it's extra considerate to include the dates and comment counts, since sometimes stories have little or no discussion. Clicking through the links blindly wastes human time, especially for a longer list such as your post.

almog OP
1. Generally speaking, dates are useful, but this is a link to article from 2008, so I'm not sure if previous submissions dates would be all that useful.

2. All links are to previous _discussions_, none are to discussion-less submissions.

This item has no comments currently.