Preferences

Off-topic critique: what is this, graph porn? There are a lot of unnecessary graphs in there, the first graph doesn't add anything because, wow, historic look at how much Russia produced, you've already written the current number, who cares what it looked like over the last 20 years. The pie chart of where the oil is exported may be relevant, but do we really need to go into such detail? The first relevant graph to the article is the price spike caused by the invasion/sanctions.

Terrible presentation when the reader has to think "what is the significance of this graphic?" with sooo many of them. But hey, looks impressive at first glance and if this were high school it'd fill the minimum page requirements.


well, they add to the credibility of what's being said. harder to fake.
Actually gives a lot of context for someone not familiar with the topic/data. I learned more from the plots than from the prose.
Reminds me of wtfhappenedin1971, although this is arguably less bad because it at least has some prose

This item has no comments currently.

Keyboard Shortcuts

Story Lists

j
Next story
k
Previous story
Shift+j
Last story
Shift+k
First story
o Enter
Go to story URL
c
Go to comments
u
Go to author

Navigation

Shift+t
Go to top stories
Shift+n
Go to new stories
Shift+b
Go to best stories
Shift+a
Go to Ask HN
Shift+s
Go to Show HN

Miscellaneous

?
Show this modal