Preferences

varispeed parent (dead)
Is mixing tech and religion appropriate? At least it would be worth dropping the word "advent" and just do a surprise month?

"Eschew flamebait. Don't introduce flamewar topics unless you have something genuinely new to say. Avoid unrelated controversies and generic tangents."

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

swiley
Christmas is hardly a religious holiday (or at least, one that celebrates a particular religion.) It was originally a pagan European celebration of the winter equinox, it got various traditions added to it (such as the yule log and Christmas tree) until eventually it was associated with the birth of Christ.

As is tradition, the American form adds its own ideas consistent with the national culture: submarine advertisement for coca cola, consumption that has a large affect on retail, and partisan politics.

KAMSPioneer
Not to be "that guy," but the celebration is of the winter /solstice/, not equinox. Just wanted to clear that up for anyone unfamiliar reading your post.

Also, I wasn't clear if you meant it this way, but the Yule Log was already a pagan tradition, and was not added by Christians but rather adopted by them.

Merry Solstice! :)

sanqui
The word advent alone doesn't have any religious connotations to me. Christmas itself is celebrated and enjoyed by many irreligious people worldwide.
joeberon
> Is mixing tech and religion appropriate?

Why wouldn't it be?

varispeed OP
Tech and science used to be safe spaces free from abusive ideologies and religion is a dumpster fire of manipulation techniques designed to enslave one's mind for profit of organisations that "own" particular religion. Place of religion is in one's home or designated space that is clearly marked that "religion is happening there". Many people were not subjected to abuse from religious organisations, so they tend to dismiss such concerns and be defensive (as they are manipulated into being as such)
stronglikedan
From what I've perceived, the anti-religion SJW types in the workplace cause more "unsafe spaces" than any of the religious people I've ever worked with. The latter barely ever share their beliefs with others (unless asked), while the former constantly push their toxic beliefs on everyone within earshot.
waterhouse
I agree... but, unfortunately, I suspect this is because of who currently holds cultural and institutional power, not because of anything inherent in the religions or ideologies in question. (There probably exist enclaves even today where religion is dominant, wherein literal holier-than-thou shaming of the less-than-totally-devout acts similarly to today's shaming by SJWs.)

Maybe someone will design a religion or ideology that would be resistant to being used for that kind of thing even if it becomes dominant. The fact that "tolerance" is such a central idea in social justice stuff, and yet here we are today, is evidence against this being possible... but I dunno, maybe there's an approach that would work. (Flying Spaghetti Monster? Some have said that humor—beyond "mocking the enemy"—is a good antidote to fanaticism.)

jojobas
Tech and science also used to be free from gatekeepers/cancellers of any kind. You want to have a QEMU Ramadan - fine. QEMU Darwin festival - awesome. Gosh, you could even have whitelists and slave processes.
swiley
IMO "science" has become its own ideology that is in practice orthogonal or even opposed to science.
funcDropShadow
Do you mean abusive idealogies like intersectionality and safe-spaceism?
cuillevel3
> Tech and science used to be safe spaces free from abusive ideologies

I don't think this is historically accurate. Such a time never existed.

We wouldn't have Temple Os if that was the case. As a Jewish (by default/birth) very non religious person, I actually celebrate many traditions including Christmas. Not from a religious aspect, but from a party get together one. And having a tree that drops presents in you house is pretty awesome.
kashyapc
Coming from a different culture myself, I wasn't aware of concept of "Advent Calendar" until 2014 when the first QEMU Advent came out.

Think of the term "advent" as "the arrival of a notable person or thing" — in this case, it's a thing :-)

That said, I don't see any issue in using that term here. Even if one is not religious (I'm not), they might appreciate the cultural aspects of it. Furthermore, the Call for Images[1] clearly says this in the postscript:

"QEMU Advent Calendar is a secular calendar (not religious). The idea is to create a fun experience for the QEMU community which can be shared with everyone. You don’t need to celebrate Christmas or another religious festival to participate!"

[1] https://www.qemu.org/2020/11/26/qemu-advent-announce/

Jon_Lowtek
Well denying people even the slightest reference to their culture is a sure way to get rid of those pesky open source people. Just punch them in the face until they leave.
Please don't respond to flamebait by taking HN threads further into flamewar. That helps nothing, and only makes this place even worse.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

This item has no comments currently.