Preferences

> In our heads, language is a combination of words and concepts, and knowledge can be encoded by making connections between concepts, not simply words. If there is no concept or idea backing up the words, it can hardly be called knowledge.

Great point.

> A language model such as GPT-3 operates only on words, not concepts. It can make connections between words on the basis of statistical correlations, but has no capacity for encoding concepts, and therefore cannot "know" anything.

Are you sure? Aren't "concepts" encoded in how language is used, at least to some degree?

LeCun does say that models that explicitly attempt represent knowledge perform better than GPT-3 in terms of answering questions. I'm no expert but I believe him.


>Aren’t “concepts” encoded in how language is used, at least to some degree?

Good point and I think this shows up to the extent different languages might affect how we express particular concepts.

However I think it is more accurate to say that language solidifies and gives form to how we express concepts and the “concepts” themselves are independent of languages. Only our “expression” of these “concepts” depends on language.

For anyone interested in art and art history, this distinction was the central focus of the French surrealist painter Rene Magritte.

This item has no comments currently.

Keyboard Shortcuts

Story Lists

j
Next story
k
Previous story
Shift+j
Last story
Shift+k
First story
o Enter
Go to story URL
c
Go to comments
u
Go to author

Navigation

Shift+t
Go to top stories
Shift+n
Go to new stories
Shift+b
Go to best stories
Shift+a
Go to Ask HN
Shift+s
Go to Show HN

Miscellaneous

?
Show this modal