"The most successful" being defined by some metric (public valuation, exit price etc.)
Then look at all the companies that qualify by that metric, and then see what % of them are unequal equity splits.
I definitely agree that there should be a clear leader who makes the call. But the argument for an unequal equity split feels extremely weak.
This item has no comments currently.
It looks like you have JavaScript disabled. This web app requires that JavaScript is enabled.
Please enable JavaScript to use this site (or just go read Hacker News).
"The most successful" being defined by some metric (public valuation, exit price etc.)
Then look at all the companies that qualify by that metric, and then see what % of them are unequal equity splits.
I definitely agree that there should be a clear leader who makes the call. But the argument for an unequal equity split feels extremely weak.