3
points
superjan
Joined 1,112 karma
- It”s worthwhile to mention that in the US and EU EMRs are generally not considered Medical Devices and are therefore not subject to a lot of regulations.
https://www.medicaleconomics.com/view/what-if-emrs-were-clas...
- Yes, or when a character moves across the screen. They are quite fine grained. However, when the decoder reads the motion vectors from the bitstream, it is typically not supposed to attach meaning to them: they could point to a patch that is not the same patch in the previous scene, but looks similar enough to serve as a starting point.
- Ok this is correct for traditional JPEG. Other flavors like Jpeg2000 use a similar (but lower overhead) version of this byte-stuffing to avoid JPEG markers from appearing in the compressed stream.
Related: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JPEG#Syntax_and_structure
- It’s true that many languages have immutable strings, but for a web-focused scripting language it makes sense to default to mutable strings. I think the comment is about that you now need to choose mutable vs immutable, and that is framed as a consequence of broader adoption. Which is a development I have also seen before.
- 2 points
- This is from the channel “the Gaze”. The channel is not the project’s author, but it does a great job introducing the idea.
The author’s page: https://wernerdevalk.nl/en/songs-of-the-horizon/
- 1 point
- You are right: it can be done with the same ALU, for sure. But the data dependency on the carry flag makes it a really different instruction from the point of view of the CPU: three data dependencies in stead of two. For the CPU it is beneficial to treat the instructions differently.
- In my recollection it was Netscape, this appers to confirm it:
https://www.jwz.org/blog/2017/09/html-email-was-that-your-fa...
- I’m in europe so I am all in on the metric system. But “about a foot” per nanosecond is so easy to remember, understand and reason about that it is worth the exception. If you prefer something European, think of a sheet of A4 printer paper: the long side is 29.7 cm. “One length of A4 per nanosecond” is within 1% of the actual value of the speed of light.
This is not news, but I read about it here today in a Dutch newspaper article (paywalled, untranslated): https://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2025/12/27/lang-verloren-gewaande-...