i'm saying that ease of dependency inclusion should not be a main criterion for evaluating how good a build system is, not that it isn't the main criterion for many people...
like the entire point of my comment is that people have misguided criteria for evaluating build systems, and your comment seems to just affirm this?
like the entire point of my comment is that people have misguided criteria for evaluating build systems, and your comment seems to just affirm this?